Good or Bad for the Jews

"Good or Bad for the Jews"

Many years ago, and for many years, I would travel to Morocco to visit uncles, cousins, and my paternal grandmother. Some lived in Tangiers;...

Sunday, October 2, 2016

The Speech I Would Like Trump to Give

Pardon my temerity and my spilling out of my narrow minor blog lane, but I have written a little speech I would like to hear Trump give. I think he could even stick to these points in the debate regardless of what is asked.

Ladies, Gentlemen, Basement Dwellers, Irredeemables, and Deplorables All,

On November 8, you and I will vote for President and Congress. We will be joined on that day by thousands upon thousands of dead Democrats and illegal aliens voting for our opponents, so make sure you turn out to cancel the massive fraud that the Democrats are planning. Let's make sure that the voice we hear is that of US citizens, alive today but concerned about the tomorrow they leave their children. We don't want America to be like the USSR, Cuba, Venezuela, or Detroit. All examples of where the path of progressivism leads.

We face a tipping point between a vision of liberty and individual freedom and that of a progressive nanny state that will decide what you can say, what you can believe and think, and how much if any of your money you can keep for yourself and your family. We are for a vision of America as a country based on universal values and responsibilities that apply to us all. We are for a country of accountable leaders who 99% of the time leave us the hell alone, and let us work out our own pursuit of happiness. Our opponents, Obama, Clinton and our morally bankrupt universities and media, promote a country full of grievances and entitlements, one in which the ruling elite will deal with those grievances and entitlements as befits and benefits the ruling elite. Our opponents want a country of no accountability for them, of laws that apply only to us, the Deplorables, but not to the anointed ones. If, for example, you and I handle classified information in a sloppy and "extremely careless way" we go to jail; if they do, they get nominated to be President. They want a country where if you speak up you get labelled deplorable, irredeemable, and racist. And the media goes along.

They want a country divided by race; we want a country dedicated to the advancement of the only race that counts: the human race.  

We have an opponent who attacks me for taking legal tax deductions under the tax code that existed while Bill Clinton was president--but look at her deductions, donations to the Clinton Foundation. We have an opponent who distorts and brings up incidents from my past as a businessman, such as occasional failures from among the thousands of efforts I have made to invest, to grow the wealth of my companies, and to employ thousands of people and give them good salaries and opportunities for advancement. We have an opponent who claims to have been "dead broke" when she and her husband left the White House. She doesn't mention why they were "dead broke." They spent a fortune on lawyers combatting the scandals of the Clinton years in power.

Well, she is certainly not "dead broke" anymore.

She and her husband are worth perhaps hundreds of millions of dollars. Where are the Clinton factories, retail outlets, hotels, and skyscrapers that provide employment and tax revenues? Don't exist. They got rich in the classic crony capitalist way of the beltway bandit. Hillary and Bill Clinton received fabulous sums for speeches to fat cats on Wall Street and abroad. On Hillary's speeches, what's amazing is that in this era of leaks, hacks, and covert IPhone recordings, nobody has seen or heard those speeches. What did she say? To whom? All nonsense, of course. It was just another classic Clinton "pay-to-play" scheme. What could Hillary Clinton have to say of such value to Goldman Sachs that they would pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to hear her give a dull thirty minute talk? How about this? "Don't worry guys. When I get into power I will take care of you." And the  media goes along.

We have an opponent who promises all sorts of things, well, that is when she's not insulting those who oppose her. She says she is for women. Really? What's her record? I'll tell you what it is: it is one of demonizing and trying to destroy women whose only crime was to tell the truth of how they had been abused by her husband. Suppressing what she called, "bimbo eruptions," that's her record. And the media goes along.

In every policy area she addresses, we must ask, well, while you were in power what did you do about that? Nothing is what Hillary Clinton did. Nothing. She has spent almost three decades roaming the corridors of power and has nothing to show for it --- well, except for hundreds of millions of dollars and a very nice walled compound in Chappaqua. It has a very nice wall. I might use it as a model for another wall.

She says she is for African-Americans and Hispanics. Really? Is that what her record shows? Not at all. She has never questioned the Democratic party policies that have led to the destruction of Detroit and so many other great American cities, the policies that have produced widespread poverty and unemployment among African-Americans. She has never questioned the policies that have led to the crumbling schools to which overwhelmingly African-America residents of those cities are forced to send their children. She has never expressed concern about the thousands of black kids killed in Chicago by gangs. She has never deviated from the Democratic orthodoxy; the Democratic Party, the party of lynch mobs, KKK, and segregation. No, instead, she has called black kids, "Super Predators." One of her closest political mentors was a senior member of the KKK. She has a habit of the bigot which is putting people into baskets, Deplorables, Basement Dwellers, Super Predators.

Hispanics? Guess what? She doesn't care for or about you either--except on November 8. Her campaign, of course, refers to Hispanic voters as the "Taco Bowl." So you Hipanics have an insult from her, too. Don't forget, also, that this was the person who was Secretary of State when Obama declared a covert war on the people of Mexico with "Operation Fast and Furious." The administration illegally shipped thousands of guns to drug cartels, killing hundreds of innocent Mexicans, not to mention at least two US federal agents. Even the murdering drug lord El Chapo got a .50 caliber rifle from Obama. Did our Secretary of State ever speak up? Did she raise an objection to this illegal and immoral policy? Did she apologize to Mexico? To the families of the dead US agents? No. Why? Mexicans in Mexico can't vote for her, and our border agents won't, so she doesn't care. And the media goes along.

She has supported horrendous trade deals which have destroyed American jobs. She once called the disastrous TPP deal, the "gold standard" of trade deals and has been walking that back since the campaign began. She wants to put coal and oil workers out of work, and replace their industries with the sort of crooked crony deals we saw in the Solyndra fiasco. Solar panels for everybody! Right.

Around the world, the interests of the United States and our allies are in collapse. Everywhere we look we are in retreat or defeat. NATO is a directionless shell. Our weakness has turned Russia into an enemy; China does not take us seriously. Even an old-time ally such as the Philippines has told us to take a hike. Our military is in severe decline. The policies of Obama and Clinton have produced bloody chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and, of course, in Libya. Her grotesque incompetence in Libya left our facilities in Benghazi exposed to the attack of--you guessed it--radical Islamic jihadis. A phrase she won't use. She will call you Deplorable, or a Super Predator, or a Basement Dweller, or a Taco Bowl, but she won't label the terrorists who killed our people in Benghazi, in Ft. Hood, in San Bernardino, in Orlando, and so many other places, what they are: radical Islamic jihadis. Instead she tried to get the radical Muslim Brotherhood into power in Egypt, and tried to prevent the Egyptian military and people from throwing them out. She has put Israel in mortal danger by pushing and supporting the insane nuclear deal with Iran in which we give them $150 billion in exchange for . . . well, nothing. She and Obama have helped Iran, the world's greatest state sponsor of terror, become a major regional power; Iran, which has sworn death to Israel and to America, is to be rewarded when it seizes our sailors, takes our citizens hostage, and provokes our ships. I have not heard her talk about how Christians, Bahais, gays, and women are treated in Iran, or for that matter in many of the other Muslim countries in the Middle East. She can't do that: It might get them to cut their donations to the corrupt Clinton Foundation.

While she was Secretary of State she ran a "pay-to-play" scheme in which donors to that corrupt Foundation got access to her, and other favors, such as exclusive cell phone contracts in Haiti. She so mismanaged the State Department that to this day, billions in aid for Haiti remain missing. And the media goes along.

Her illegal and, yes, immoral use of a private server on which to conduct official classified State Department business has exposed our nation's secrets and, perhaps, even led to the death of an intelligence source. She even had exchanges with the President on this system, something which Obama had denied. So when I hear her talk about her concern for cybersecurity, I have to laugh. And the media goes along.

Hillary Clinton and the Democrats don't want us to defend our borders or our sovereignty. They know there is no way to vet the tens-of-thousands of Middle Eastern refugees. They don't care; one day they'll vote Democrat is the thinking. They want endless numbers of people to pour in, unchecked, to pad the voter rolls, and become dependent on government largesse controlled, of course, by the Democratic party machine. Hillary Clinton and the Democratic establishment don't care about the impact these immigration and asylum polices have on the poor or the middle class. The Democrats need to have poor people. They thrive on the misery of others.

Electing Hillary Clinton is re-electing a stagnant economy; it is a vote for the disastrous Obamacare; it is for the political use of the NSA, the FBI, the IRS, the EPA, and more Washington agencies. Electing her is a sure way to wipe out the second amendment and so many other of our rights. She wants the government involved in every aspect of your life and wants the government to take what you have earned not only while you are alive, but even after you're dead. It makes sense, I guess: a political party that famously uses the votes of dead people has no problem taxing the dead, too. And the media goes along.

Reject the progressives and their effort to transform America into another failed socialist state. Vote for liberty; vote for a prosperous and free future. Make America Great Again!


  1. Would you give it to him, please?

  2. My advice? Don't catch measles ... it will be almost impossible to spot the red laser dot when she orders your assassination.

    Considering the early mortality of people that cross the Clintons, I don't think that it is unreasonable advice.

    (As a side joke, what is the most dangerous street in the USA? Clinton Boulevard. No one crosses that and lives ...).

    Phil B

  3. A wonderful speech, one that indicates deep thought about the issues, expresses solutions in reasonable detail and thoroughly indicts Herself for her high crimes and misdemeanors.

    The best line, I thought, was about how the Clintons got filthy rich, but the country has nothing to show for it. At least Trump, despite the stumbles of some of his enterprises, created jobs and some of the wealth his investors shared in.

    Sad to say, Trump doesn't have the focus to read (silently, to himself) this well-crafted speech, although he could probably deliver it fairly effectively from a teleprompter.

    But afterward, I don't think he could effectively recycle its major points with the necessary precision, or counter any challenges to them without falling back on his usual word-salad bluster.

    Barack Obama once said something to the effect of he was a better speechwriter than any speechwriter he employed, a better political director than any political director he had ever had, etc. etc.

    Trump clearly thinks of himself the same way.

    Yours is a valiant effort, Sr. DiploMad, but I think it's in vain.

    1. "Trump...could probably deliver it fairly effectively from a teleprompter."

      You bet your arse he could 'Bro! With or without 'prompts see terrorism speech linked below

      And his endearing and effective "word-salad" got him to where he is, and allowed him to bull through a herd of RINO blowhards, the Democrat Media, and GOPe dirty tricks!

      As to your recitation of BHO's narcissism to define Trump's "thinking", smells an awful lot like what comes out the hind end of a RINO!

      Lastly, to suggest that Dip's written efforts are "in vain" and then call your stuff "thinking" suggests a level of narcissism on par with Oprah Windy!
      Love ya like a bro,
      On Watch~~~
      "Let's Roll"

      Donald Trump's full

  4. Quite superb

  5. Believe you've touched all the bases WLA!
    On Par with JFK and MLK methinks!
    Although your Trump "We have a Nightmare" speech
    makes me want to SCREAM! Especially during the ECHO parts!
    {{{And the compliant media goes along.}}}

    I added another ECHO, following:
    "They don't care; one day they'll vote Democrat is the thinking."
    {{{And the compliant media goes along.}}}

    and the 'ECHO' Builds to a Crescendo,

    "a political party that [im]famously uses the votes of dead people has no problem taxing the dead, too."
    {{{And the compliant media goes along.}}}

    then in his best 'I'm the Boss - She's fired' voice,
    The Commander in Chief finishes with a flourish~~~

    "Reject the progressives and their [despicable] effort to transform America into another failed socialist state. Vote for liberty; vote for a prosperous and free future.

    >Make America Great Again!<"

    On Watch
    Roll the Presses!

  6. Great speech. In addition, I hope Trump finds a moment to ask people to go to his website and read the press releases. Those press releases, going back for a couple of months, are excellent. They detail the truth about the Clintons and they explain Trump's policy proposals and the real condition of the country. They are better than any newspaper.

    1. "Those press releases...are excellent. They detail the truth ... and they explain Trump's policy proposals..."

      Concur Anon! Here's the latest, timely and on target!
      - October 03, 2016 -


      Marine Staff Sergeant Chad Robichaux, President and Founder of Mighty Oaks Warrior Programs in Temecula, Calif., responded to false reports about comments Donald Trump made this morning about PTSD at the National Security and Military Summit, featuring questions from retired military brass. Sergeant Robichaux asked Mr. Trump about problems with the treatment veterans are currently getting for PTSD, something he suffered from and overcame after eight combat tours in Afghanistan. His organization has had a successful record of helping veterans with PTSD.

      “I think it’s sickening that anyone would twist Mr. Trump’s comments to me in order to pursue a political agenda. I took his comments to be thoughtful and understanding of the struggles many veterans have, and I believe he is committed to helping them. The nature of my question focused on a broken system that’s failing so many of our veterans and, as president, would Mr. Trump take a more holistic approach to health care for veterans. I interpreted his answer to affirm that the system is broken and he would take the necessary steps to address it.

      After eight combat tours in Afghanistan I came home and was diagnosed with PTSD, and I struggled with it. Since my own recovery I’ve been privileged to help 1100 veterans who have graduated from our program; none of whom have committed suicide since graduating. It’s a very important issue to me, which is why I was thankful for the opportunity to ask Mr. Trump about it directly.”

      On Watch~~~
      "Let's Roll"

  7. I would love to see the other Republican candidates step up and support Trump. Cruz, Rubio, Huckabee, Jindal, Perry, and Walker should be in the front row of the next debate on the Trump side.

  8. Had high regard, and high hopes, for all of them once upon a time... and it sure would be a well received 'show of solidarity' if they could put aside their wounded egos, for the good of the Party, if not for their Party's Presidential Nominee!

    1. Right now the only thing worse than getting Hillary in the WH is getting Chelsea.

  9. Should Trump attempt to deliver such an insightful speech his mic would be cut off, they would go to commercial and when they came back announce that unfortunately Mr. Trump has suffered some sort of mental breakdown and been taken, for his own safety of course, to an undisclosed mental health facility. Move on. Nothing to see here.

  10. Our host wrote:

    "Electing Hillary Clinton is re-electing a stagnant economy; it is a vote for the disastrous Obamacare; it is for the political use of the NSA, the FBI, the IRS, the EPA, and more Washington agencies. Electing her is a sure way to wipe out the second amendment and so many other of our rights. She wants the government involved in every aspect of your life and wants the government to take what you have earned not only while you are alive, but even after you're dead. It makes sense, I guess: a political party that famously uses the votes of dead people has no problem taxing the dead, too. And the media goes along."

    I'll add that I see Shrillary Shroooooooooooo as an enemy of the Free Exercise of Religion, Free Speech, Free Press, Freedom of Peaceable Assembly, and other clauses of the First Amendment. She would also establish a state-sponsored religion of EmCeePeeCee coupled with sexual perversion (think the abominations of the Canaanites, for which Israel was commanded to wipe them from the land; and for imitating which Israel was in turn wiped from the land by the Assyrians and Babylonians--Tisha' B'Ov, rather than Rosh Hashanah, has been weighing on my mind lately).

  11. Well now, it looks like you have the makings of a second career. Trump may or may not make this speech, but millions upon millions of Americans are mumbling it everyday.
    James the Lesser


    Obama DOJ drops charges against alleged broker of Libyan weapons -- Arms dealer had threatened to expose Hillary Clinton’s talks about arming anti-Qadhafi rebels.

    . . .
    Lawyers for the Justice Department on Monday filed a motion in federal court in Phoenix to drop the case against the arms dealer, an American named Marc Turi, whose lawyers also signed the motion.

    . . .
    The deal averts a trial that threatened to cast additional scrutiny on Hillary Clinton’s private emails as Secretary of State, and to expose reported Central Intelligence Agency attempts to arm rebels fighting Libyan leader Moammar Qadhafi.

    . . .
    A Turi associate asserted that the government dropped the case because the proceedings could have embarrassed Clinton and President Barack Obama by calling attention to the reported role of their administration in supplying weapons that fell into the hands of Islamic extremist militants.

    . . .
    Turi’s lawyers argued that the shipments were part of a U.S. government-authorized effort to arm Libyan rebels.

    It’s unclear if any of the weapons made it to Libya, and there’s no evidence linking weapons provided by the U.S. government to the Benghazi attacks.

    “The proposal did not result in an actual transfer of defense articles to Libya,” the State Department official told POLITICO on Tuesday.

    But questions about U.S. efforts to arm Libyan rebels have been mounting, since weapons have reportedly made their way from Libya to Syria, where a civil war is raging between the Syrian Government and ISIL-aligned fighters.

    During 2013 Senate hearings on the 2012 Benghazi attack, Clinton, under questioning from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), said she had no knowledge of weapons moving from Libya into Turkey.

    Wikileaks head Julian Assange in July suggested that he had emails proving that Clinton “pushed” the “flows” of weapons “going over to Syria.”

    Read all about it!

  13. This is the transcript of his speech in Colorado:

    If you have been watching the actual speeches, he has made an unbelievable improvement. It's a shame that the media can't just cover this in an unbiased way.