Featured Post

The Coup Attempt Continues

Some eight days before Trump's inauguration, and in the midst of the Russia hysteria, I wrote I have never seen such a pile on as the ...

Tuesday, September 1, 2020

The Fraud Keeps on Coming . . .

Well, well, and well, again. 

I see that the Democrat party's not-so-well candidate for, uh . . . you know, the thing . . . that White House thing has, uh, C'mon man! You know! Yes, ol' Groundhog Joe "Hidden" Biden got prodded out of his basement lair for a "campaign" stop in Pennsylvania. What a joke. He read, and garbled, a 12 minute statement--no questions allowed--in front of an empty room blaming President Trump for the violence executed by Democrats and their Antifa/BLM thug allies. This, by the way, comes after months of Democrat denial that said violence even existed. He made a tepid call to stop burning stuff, implying, of course, that Trump's people did the burning. He never mentioned Antifa or BLM or the call for insurrection by prominent Democrats, including you know, what's her name, the, the, the one who's his running mate? 

Joe's speech-writers, naturally, failed to have Hair Plugs note that the violence takes place in Democrat-run cities; nor did they have Joe recognize the devastating flight from those cities by people sick of the violence, corruption, and ever-rising taxes brought on by decades of Democrat rule. Joe then put on his best Tony Soprano imitation, and said that if Trump gets re-elected the violence will continue, showing, once again, that the Democrat Party, as this modest blog has mentioned on several occasions, is nothing more than a criminal organization specializing in lynchings, extortion, and mob rule.

So, therefore, let's get this straight: Democrats, per Hillary and others, should not concede the election if and when they lose, despite all their violence and fraud, and vow to unleash more violence on us if and when they do lose. Wow! All that, and we must see Trump as the threat to democracy. Right.

On another fraud front, the "deadly pandemic" looks less and less like a, well, a deadly pandemic.

It seems those of us--including your humble blogger--highly skeptical from the start of the nature of the threat from the ChiCom virus, once again, have proven correct.

Yeah, yeah, I have read the spin by those who want to keep the economy shutdown, and all of us huddling in fear, but they can't get away from the fact that the CDC, yes, the Sainted CDC, the Holy of Holies, the holder of the Revealed Wisdom, the promoter of the "experts" and their "models," etc., casually recognized that of all the deaths labelled as COVID-19 deaths in only six percent did the feared virus, prove "the only cause mentioned." For deaths, the CDC continues, with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there existed "2.6 additional conditions or causes per death."

It then refers the reader to Table 3. Look at it. Laugh, weep, get angry.

So, six percent, folks. Laugh, weep, get angry.

The other 94% of "COVID" deaths had an average of 2.6 other "additional conditions or causes per death." You also will see that advanced age played a major role--advanced age always has played a role in death rates . . .. 

In sum, therefore, the VAST majority (94%!) of deaths attributed to COVID-19 we could have attributed to something else. The "experts" at work, folks, the "experts" at work. Keep the spin going. Fraudsters.

It's gotten to the point where if you have nail fungus, and get shot in the head in Portland by an Antifa gangster, the "experts" will attribute your death to the nail fungus.

So, then, six percent of 180,000 reported deaths. . . . class, break out your calculators . . . probably proves much closer to the real death number from the virus; even this figure requires us, of course, to ignore the extraordinary number of false positives, as well as the political and the financial incentives built into reporting COVID-related deaths. We, therefore, have to take that 180,000 number on "faith" when, in fact, it most certainly is vastly inflated.

Giant fraud, again.

Guns to Mexico, Russia Collusion, children in cages, Ukraine quid-pro-quo, global climate change, nooses on campus and at NASCAR . . . keep'em coming Dems . . .

24 comments:

  1. What would the role of CPC be in this, and in particular, the Hubei/Wuhan region?

    ReplyDelete
  2. DiploMad,

    Usually you avoid the outright stupid, but we all fail sometimes. Those 6% of the forms are filled out incorrectly, because people die when their heart stops, they stop breathing, the brain failure, etc.

    The actual reason people die is the "underlying cause", and in 92% of covid19 deaths, it's the only underlying cause.

    However, since I'm not a doctor, perhaps you'd rather a doctor explain this in more detail.

    https://respectfulinsolence.com/2020/08/31/only-six-percent-gambit-latest-viral-covid-19-disinformation/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unlike me. I guess, you do not avoid the consistently stupid. You have consistently pushed and spun every nutty Dem talking point and conspiracy. You were a strong advocate of the whole Russia Collusion nonsense, quoting at length the idiotic Adam Schiff. You have pushed the insane global climate change hoax and have even tried to blame--a la Biden-- the violence in American cities and their meltdown on "Proud boys" and "Neo-Confederates." Now you push COVID hysteria. You have no credibility. Go back to your "expert" models and make your "expert" predictions. You also seem obsessed with this blog.

      Delete
    2. Obssessed? I am hear to enjoy the show and listen to what cons are saying about the world. I haven't even come close to pushing every talking point I could.

      Pointing out that people misunderstood how death certificates work is not 'Covid19 hysteria'. No death certificate should have covid19, nor diabetes, nor a car crash as the only listed cause of death, even though we know all of these things can be fatal.

      It's possible to be a sincere advocate for a cause and still be honest about simple things like 'how a death certificate works'. It's not even political (at least, in left vs. right terms), there are plenty of left-wing lunatics that are pushing lies on things like covid19 or vaccines.

      Still, if you ask to me to leave, I will. Your blog, your rules.

      Delete
    3. Oh, you have been disinvited by our host quite clearly in the past. It's the life of the troll to obsess and harass.. which finds you here, after undoubtedly scouring the internet consistently to find word of where this blog continued after the domain hijack.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous,

      I have been insulted and diminished by our host, but I do not recall one time he has asked me to leave. If you can link to such an occasion, please do so.

      Yes, when the blog was off-line, I did an occasional Google search for it, as I am sure many others on this site did. Are they all obsessed?

      I object to the notion of bringing in factually correct information about death certificates as "trolling". Don't you want to know the truth?

      Delete
    5. yes, because you've got the only text in the entire page referencing 'death certificate'... to attempt to bring up and off-topic diversion discussion is to troll. As is common for the left, "obfuscate, redirect, wedge-my-weakness-into-a-dark-corner, change the meaning of the words I use to fit my need to oppress others today."
      seriously... you aren't 'educating' anybody here, you're repeating falsehoods and half-truths... find something interesting to say and you'll be more than welcome.

      I think there have been a myriad of times where you've been disinvited with "why don't you go..." by our dear host. But trolls don't need an invitation, nor do they acquiesce to disinvitations.

      Delete
    6. and before you ask, I'm pretty sure that Dear Dip is not going to bother to ban you... as even if he did, you'd sock-puppet away anyways.. as trolls and sock-puppets go hand in hand.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous,
      yes, because you've got the only text in the entire page referencing 'death certificate'...

      I guess you did not read the original post:
      ... casually recognized that of all the deaths labelled as COVID-19 deaths in only six percent did the feared virus, prove "the only cause mentioned." For deaths, the CDC continues, with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there existed "2.6 additional conditions or causes per death."

      In fact, half of the original post is referring to covid19 and these death certificates. How could you miss that?

      ... to attempt to bring up and off-topic diversion discussion is to troll.

      What a sad world you live in. So determined that I must be an enemy, that you can't see responding is half of the content of a post is not "off topic".

      As is common for the left, "obfuscate, redirect, wedge-my-weakness-into-a-dark-corner, change the meaning of the words I use to fit my need to oppress others today."

      As is common for humans, you understand your own tactics and project them onto me.

      seriously... you aren't 'educating' anybody here, you're repeating falsehoods and half-truths... find something interesting to say and you'll be more than welcome.

      Why would I need to feel welcome?

      Of course I'm not educating anyone here. The backfire effect is in full force. When I ask a question like ' Don't you want to know the truth?' it is strictly rhetorical, because I'm aware you'd rather win than know the truth.

      I think there have been a myriad of times where you've been disinvited with "why don't you go..." by our dear host. But trolls don't need an invitation, nor do they acquiesce to disinvitations.

      I interpreted that as an actual request for why I'm here having fun with the rest of you. It's simple enough to type "Please do not post here again", or something similar, if he wants me to go.

      and before you ask, I'm pretty sure that Dear Dip is not going to bother to ban you... as even if he did, you'd sock-puppet away anyways.. as trolls and sock-puppets go hand in hand.

      I thank you again for revealing how you would handle being banned. As for me, I was banned on CARM about 20 years ago, and have not returned, because I treat people with basic respect.

      Delete
  3. The issue her is how we responded. Lock down the vulnerable not the healthy. You don't defeat drunk driving by forbidding the sober from driving
    Davidg1218

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Drunk driving is not contagious, and you can't effectively lock down the vulnerable without locking down a lot of the non-vulnerable. For example, people have to prepare food in nursing homes, take out trash, etc.

      Delete
    2. That is a fair point about the need to make sure the people who prepare the food in nursing homes don't infect "Those Who Are About To Die".

      But why Lock Down all the people who don't work in nursing homes? It is now undeniable from the observed statistics that children and working age people face only a trivial risk from the Covid-19 virus.

      Delete
    3. Gavin Longmuir,

      We live in an interconnected society. I shop at the same grocery stores as the people who work in nursing homes. Unless you completely separate out entire segments of society (ala the NBA bubble), locking out a part is very little different from locking out nothing.

      If people feel the lives saved are not worth the price of locking down, I won't try to persuade them otherwise. I only object to a pretense that is does not save lives.

      Delete
    4. Let's not use the Far Left trope of "saving lives". The fact of the matter -- distasteful as it appears to be to those on the Far Left -- is that we all die. Even me. Even you. All any treatment or policy can do is delay inevitable death.

      In the case of Covid-19, we know now with absolute certainty that those at risk are the very old, and usually also the very sick. If you have ever been close to those people, you know that many of them are "Waiting for God", with a poor quality of life that they have little interest in extending.

      We also know now that Lock Downs have resulted in premature deaths of other people who could have been "saved" if they had been able to get normal medical treatment. This is the real world -- extending the lives of some people through Lock Downs has shortened the lives of other people; there is no free lunch.

      Anyway, Covid-19 is only one of many infectious diseases. And we now know that it is not a particularly serious disease either. By your logic, all human beings would have to be kept isolated from each other for ever, which seems to be in line with the anti-human agenda of the Far Left.

      Delete
    5. Gavin Longmuir,
      In the case of Covid-19, we know now with absolute certainty that those at risk are the very old, and usually also the very sick.

      You said this on the very same day that a doctor from Penn State said that a third of the Big Ten athletes who contracted covid had myocarditis.

      https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/bigten/2020/09/03/big-ten-athletes-covid-had-myocarditis-symptoms-one-third-cases/5704234002/

      So, unless you think of Big 10 athletes as being very old and very sick, it's hard to imagine a better irony on this topic.

      We are something along the line of 300K excess deaths in the last 6 months from covid. What's a good estimate for trhe number of lives lost from the lock down?

      covid19 is more fatal and has more serious side effects thn any other disease that spreads easily and we do not have a vaccine for.

      I will refrain from mischaracterizing your logic as you mischaracterize mine.

      Delete
    6. myocarditis has been a growing diagnosis... may or may not have anything to do with covid, or with long term disabilities, or the price of tea in china, or, perhaps unfortunately, your wit.

      Delete
    7. Growing to the point where it gets detected in a thirrd of the populace?

      Delete
    8. What's really frustrating is how this has become a political issue. I don't recall any previous time were we had strong political disagreements over treating a disease.

      Delete
    9. You're the one making it a political issue.. nobody else.
      You directly infer that this is somehow tied to covid and some suspected lack of 'treating it with appropriate seriousness'.

      ------------ You said this on the very same day that a doctor from Penn State said that a third of the Big Ten athletes who contracted covid had myocarditis.--------

      That's the 'political' issue...
      Most likely, it will be traced back to PEDs, or novel testing regimens.... but play your politics before it's too late to influence the election with lies! :)

      Delete
    10. Anonymous,

      All I did was point out that the 6% finding had been misinterpreted, that covid19 is not comparable to drunk driving, etc. Any politics in this thread is coming from other people.

      I referred the the prevalence of myocarditis to show that, unlike what some have claimed, covid19 is a serious issue for people of all ages. Perhaps you missed the article, but it referred specifically to covid19 patients having myocarditis. Are you saying that a third of all big 10 athletes have myocarditis? Do you have a shred of evidence for that?

      Delete
  4. As usual, Low-brow slides in with a sack of moldy manure, shaken his ass to the D'rat beat -- mouthing empty words saying nothing, followed by a goofy waste of time link that returns:
    "This site can’t be reached respectfulinsolence.com took too long to respond."
    Try: Checking the connection - Checking the proxy and the firewall
    Running Windows Network Diagnostics -ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT"

    GAME OVER UNI-BROW, you're a waste of time & bandwidth, as well as a disrespectful nitwit! I VOTE You go stick your HEAD in the Crapper, and flush yourself overboard! Unless of course our Host finds your looney Lefty patter a 'required diversity training' segment? Till then go sh!t in your flat hat-mate, you stink!
    On Watch~~~
    "Let's Roll"

    ReplyDelete
  5. On Watch,

    If you can't pull up Respectful Insolence, something is wrong with your computer or you have a mighty odd firewall.

    As it happens, Orac of Respectful Insolence aligns with neither the D'rats nor the Rethugs, neither the progs nor the cons, neither the left nor the right. He aligns with the actual science.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So, now that we have the POTUS on tape saying he knew the virus was going to be worse than the flu, and he deliberately downplayed it "to avoid panic", can we put this nonsense to rest?

    ReplyDelete