Good or Bad for the Jews

"Good or Bad for the Jews"

Many years ago, and for many years, I would travel to Morocco to visit uncles, cousins, and my paternal grandmother. Some lived in Tangiers;...

Friday, May 13, 2011

Europe Unravels . . . Again

Europe officially came to an end on the morning of June 6, 1944. 

Readers, certainly, can pick other dates, but for me that is the one that sealed it.

Already in decline as an economic, military, scientific, and engineering power for the prior 50 or so years, Europe’s relegation to secondary status became crystal clear for all to see on that violence-filled day on which the Allies landed on the beaches of  Nazi-occupied France. That event took place only because of the overwhelming economic, industrial, and military power of the United States.  Giving full credit to the courage and skill of the British, and recognizing that without the British the war probably would have been lost, we must also recognize that without the United States the war certainly could not have been won.  Without that enormous American power, no hope existed to repulse Hitler's Nazi occupiers, or to prevent a possible new occupation by Stalin’s Communists. The price, however, for needing American assistance was that for the rest of the 20th century, while many issues that preoccupied the world came from or took place there, Europe served only as the stage, and provided the scenery, and some bit actors. The show was managed almost exclusively from Washington D.C. and Moscow.

The transformation of various European commercial, and then economic and political unity schemes that eventually produced the current EU monstrosity is well-known, I won't go through that whole history. Let's just say that it brings into doubt Darwin's theory of the survival of the fittest. The EU as currently structured is a scheme that has as its political purpose to reestablish Europe as the center of the world, and dim the light of those braggarts with their Coca-Cola, cowboys, Hollywood, aircraft carriers, and comic books on the other side of the Atlantic. Many years ago, as the EU monster was growing and making ugly noises, I told a German diplomat friend that "France sees the EU as an anti-American project led by French politicians, protected by British troops, and paid for by German taxpayers." That was in the early 1980s; I wasn't too far off.

If you go to the EU's official websites you see lots of bragging about all that the EU has "done," e.g., ended the Cold War, brought peace to Europe, etc. It is written sort of like an Obama speech.  It's, of course, rubbish. The EU has basically done nothing except create an enormous bureaucratic Frankenstein and come up with the ultimate Procrustean bed, the Euro. Peace? Sorry, mes amies, it was the cowboys, and their nasty computers, high tech economy, Star Wars weapons, neutron bombs, cruise missiles, and aircraft carrier battle groups that kept the peace and drove the USSR into extinction and reunified Germany--now that's how Darwin is supposed to work! Prosperity? Nope. It was the Marshall Plan, and the American willingness to protect Europe even while Europeans ran around and promoted their cheeses, wines, unwatchable movies, DeGaul, and lectured us on what barbarians we were. When, for example, the situation in ex-Yugoslavia came blowing apart, it wasn't wine, cheese, Brigitte Bardot, Sartre, or the French Foreign Legion, that resolved it. It was the cowboys, once again. It has got be tough to be a European.

Now the whole thing is coming apart at the seams. The question is how much longer are the Germans willing to be the bankers for French ambitions? The Germans are, in many ways, admirable. They, frankly, are at times surprisingly like us; certainly our science and engineering owes them a debt of gratitude--it was their political stupidity that drove some of the finest scientific minds in history to our lands on which they found very fertile ground. They are hard working and amazingly productive: one of the great things about Germany has been its ability to export goods and services regardless of whether the exchange rates are with them or against them. That is a tribute to their productivity and their concern for quality. But, but, they are getting a raw deal in the EU, a deal that not even they will be able to keep paying for. They have to pay for Greece, Portugal, Ireland, and soon Spain, Italy, Belgium, and who knows who else is in the wings waiting with a hand out. And let us not forget, that EU politics are essentially about hand outs: doles, subsidies, protectionism . . . the model for Obama, in other words.

Will the Germans keep paying? Will they keep taking orders from the French, or will we see a rebirth of German nationalism, sick of the rest of Europe reaching into its pockets and constantly throwing WWII in its face. That guilt train will eventually go off the rails, and then we will have something to see . . .

Europe never has recovered from June 6, 1944. 


  1. I had to laugh when the British and French were left to conduct offensive operations against Libya. The Brits struggled to keep 8 Typhoons operational. The French with a few more Rafales, faced similar problems. Neither countries had decent ECM support or targeting capabilities. And neither planes are particularly good attack aircraft. But they do look good at the Paris and Farnborough air shows.

    Quite frankly the military in all European contries exist for only one reason. And that is to provide a showcase for their arms exporters. They are incapable of sustained operations, they are short on spares, and ran out of precision munitions in the early days of the conflict.

    In comparison we had a carrier in the Red Sea enroute to the Med with 48-50 FA-18s capable of sustained operations and a pipeline of fuel and weapons to keep going for weeks.

    Europe is all show and no go.

  2. Yurrup depends on US defense welfare. That's all there is to it, Corky.

  3. You may be correct about that date, or it may have been merely the beginning of the end. I believe their fate was forever sealed closer to May 8, 1945, when the "euro class" began demonstrating their eagerness to do anything to placate the bear.

    Most of them are no better than prostitutes, IMHO, willing to subjugate and debase themselves in any way demanded by "customers". They think survival at any cost is more important than freedom, and thus they and their progeny are doomed to never be free.

  4. I suppose it depends upon how you define "winning" WWII in Europe. If the goal was to defeat Hitler's National Socialist party, then the USSR could have done that alone in another few years. North Africa would likely have "freed" itself as Hitler withdrew materials to defend Germany. Now if the goal was to also keep the Communists out of continental Europe, then this clearly required the USA. And given the political and social attitudes of much of Europe after WWII, I don't think they really cared one way or the other, except for Germany.

  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.